Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

TrueBlue

Subscribe to TrueBlue's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Trump claims he is no longer interested in Nobel Peace Prize and doesn't know if Iran war will hurt his future chances ... read more


Comments

via GOOGLE:

Second Amendment rights are not unlimited, and the Supreme Court has clarified that the government can prohibit "dangerous and unusual weapons" not in common use for lawful purposes. Generally, fully automatic machine guns, short-barreled shotguns, and destructive devices (e.g., explosives) are heavily regulated or banned. While self-defense arms like handguns are protected, states may restrict specific types of firearms, such as assault weapons, and high-capacity magazines.Weapons Commonly Restricted or BannedMachine Guns: Specifically M-16s and similar, which are considered dangerous and unusual.Short-barreled shotguns/rifles: Regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934."Assault Weapons": Certain semi-automatic rifles with specific military-style features.Large Capacity Magazines: Magazines holding more than a certain number of rounds.Destructive Devices: Bombs, grenades, and similar explosive weapons.Other Devices: Silencers/suppressors are heavily regulated, and some jurisdictions restrict stun guns or other items.Legal Standards for Restrictions"Dangerous and Unusual": The Heller decision (2008) established that weapons failing the "common use" test (i.e., not commonly used for lawful purposes like self-defense) can be banned."Common Use": Weapons in common use for lawful purposes, such as handguns, are protected.Military Equipment: While the amendment mentions a militia, modern, purely military-grade, or highly dangerous weaponry can be restricted.Key Court Cases Limiting WeaponsDistrict of Columbia v. Heller (2008): Confirmed an individual right to bear arms but permitted bans on dangerous/unusual weapons.United States v. Miller (1939): Upheld regulations on weapons not having a reasonable relationship to the efficiency of a militia.Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016): Clarified that the Second Amendment extends to bearable arms not in existence at the time of the founding, such as stun guns.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy